It is no longer surprising that everyone seems to have expert knowledge on breast cancer, despite having no training, expertise or experience in identifying and taking care of women with such a disease. While the June 20 editorial ("A new and dubious breast cancer law") pointed out some of the drawbacks of the Breast Density Bill, it is incomplete and misses the purpose of the bill.
While the Star Tribune noted that the American Cancer Society and the Minnesota Medical Association were neutral on the legislation, the Minnesota Radiological Society, the group of physicians who actually diagnose women and would implement the specifics of the bill, was supportive. The editorial hearkens back to days past when women were told they were "OK," the doctor will take care of it.
What are the specifics of this "thoughtless" bill?
1) Women with dense breasts have an increased risk of breast cancer.
2) Women with dense breasts on mammography should be notified that detecting cancer on their mammogram may be more difficult.
3) Such women may wish to consider additional methods of screening for breast cancer.
Women are already notified in writing of the results of their mammogram. This additional information will not be a burden to add. What the editorial did correctly state is that there needs to be education on what the information means.
What does having a dense breast mean? First, 50 percent of women have dense breasts. The vast majority of these women have heterogeneously dense breasts, which means they are only mildly increased in density. Approximately 10 percent have extremely dense breasts. For a woman with mildly increased density, the risk of breast cancer is 1.2 times normal, a very small increase in risk. For a woman with an extremely dense breast, the risk is two times normal, still a modest increase in overall risk.