Jury selection starts Tuesday in Minneapolis in the federal child sex trafficking trial of Anton Lazzaro, a once-rising figure in Minnesota Republican Party politics who has been in custody since his August 2021 arrest.
The 32-year-old briefly returned to court Monday to settle final legal motions before his trial begins. Chief U.S. District Judge Patrick Schiltz said he expected a jury to be picked by the end of Tuesday and for opening statements to start Wednesday morning.
Lazzaro faces the possibility of decades in prison if convicted. He has been indicted on seven counts that include conspiracy, sex trafficking of a minor and obstruction. Gisela Castro Medina, a 20-year-old former University of St. Thomas student who has since pleaded guilty in the case, is expected to testify about meeting Lazzaro through a "sugar daddy" website, and being paid for sex before agreeing to help recruit other young girls — some 15 and 16 years old — to have sex with the GOP donor for money.
Lazzaro on Monday formally pleaded not guilty to all counts of a superseding indictment filed this month. Much of Monday's 90-minute hearing patched up what the prosecution and defense can and cannot tell jurors as they make their respective cases.
Schiltz is barring any mention before the jury of previously litigated arguments, such as claims from Lazzaro that he is being selectively or vindictively prosecuted for his political affiliations and wealth. The judge previously refused to dismiss the case on those grounds and in January rejected a letter sent by Lazzaro urging him to reconsider.
Schiltz will also not allow attacks on prosecutors' political leanings or contributions, nor will he permit reference to Lazzaro's past efforts to investigate U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.
Lazzaro has tried to argue that the alleged victims in this case consented to sex and that Minnesota's age of consent – 16 – should also be a focus.
Schiltz said Monday that both parties may introduce evidence about what Lazzaro and the alleged victims said or did. But the defense cannot argue that because an alleged victim consented, another statute was not violated, the judge added.