Jury: Husband guilty of killing pregnant wife in Apple Valley

In the wee hours of Tuesday morning, Roger E. Holland was found guilty of murder in the death of his wife, Margorie Ann Holland, and their unborn child in their Apple Valley townhouse.

A jury convicted him on all counts: two first-degree premeditated murder charges and two of second-degree intentional murder, according to the Dakota County Attorney's Office.

The jury deliberated about 10 hours before returning its verdict just before 1 a.m.

Margorie Ann Holland's family will have a chance to address the court during a sentencing hearing at 1 p.m. Tuesday. Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom will hold a news conference immediately after the hearing.

"We are pleased to have brought Roger Holland to justice for this senseless and violent crime that took the lives of Margorie Holland and her unborn child," Backstrom said in a statement. "Our deep sympathy is extended to the family and friends of Marjorie Holland for their great loss."

Before beginning deliberations about 1:30 p.m. Monday, the jury listened to closing arguments from prosecutor Phil Prokopowicz and defense attorney Marsh Halberg.

Jurors had testimony of more than two dozen witnesses — including Holland — and upward of 500 pieces of evidence to sift through to reach their verdict. Holland was accused of strangling his 37-year-old wife, who was 15 weeks pregnant with their first child.

"She fought," he said. "She fought for her life and that of her unborn child."

Halberg, however, told the jury that the lead police investigator "convicted Holland in the first five minutes."

Any evidence that pointed toward accidental causes for Margorie Holland's death was ignored. Suffocation, rather than strangulation, was never considered as a possible cause of death. The first statements Holland gave police were lost or destroyed. And the 25 law enforcers and rescuers who were in the Hollands' townhouse the day of her death could very well have contaminated the scene with unknown DNA.

According to the charges and trial testimony, the Hollands met while both were serving in the Texas National Guard. They married about three years ago and moved from San Antonio to Apple Valley in late December 2012 so Margorie Holland, who grew up in Faribault, Minn., could be closer to her family while she was pregnant.

The morning of March 7, Roger Holland left to pick up breakfast for the couple. When he returned, he found his wife lying at the bottom of the stairs, unresponsive and not breathing. He called 911 at 9:57 a.m., and police, fire and medical personnel tried to resuscitate Margorie Holland for more than an hour, first at the townhouse, then at the hospital before she was declared dead shortly before 11:30 a.m.

The medical examiner determined that Margorie Holland's manner of death was homicide and the cause was strangulation. Investigators testified that they later learned about a web of lies, deceit and fraud Roger Holland had perpetrated on his wife.

He didn't have a high-paying job, as he had told her; he actually was unemployed. He had maxed out her credit cards and signed promissory notes for up to $25,000.

The couple fought fiercely via text message about finances and Margorie Holland had threatened to divorce him and turn him in to authorities for using her credit cards. There also were searches on Roger Holland's laptop and iPhone about whether a person can break their neck falling down stairs and whether it's possible to break someone's neck with your bare hands.

"Ladies and gentlemen, the defendant Roger Holland considered, planned and prepared for the death of his wife," Prokopowicz said Monday. "What the defendant didn't have was a good plan to cover it up."

Halberg told the jury, though, that the couple's financial picture wasn't nearly as bad as the prosecution portrayed. Two cars made up $80,000 of the debt. Two motorcycles accounted for another $28,000.

Margorie Holland's brother testified that he believed Roger and his sister were "soul mates," Halberg reminded the jury.

"It's not your job to solve this case," Halberg told them. "It's your job to decide if it's been proven beyond a reasonable doubt."