The judge overseeing the federal civil rights lawsuit filed recently on behalf of George Floyd's family has led a legal career placing her squarely at the center of some of the nation's most complex cases.
While in private practice in the 1990s, Susan Richard Nelson helped negotiate the state's historic $6 billion-plus settlement with the tobacco industry. Shortly after being confirmed as a federal judge in Minnesota, she issued a ruling that staved off an NFL lockout. And, years later, she oversaw a settlement in a wave of concussion lawsuits against the NHL.
Now, her role in a discrimination lawsuit filed more than a decade ago by five high-ranking veteran Black Minneapolis police officers — one of whom, Medaria Arradondo, is now chief — has taken on new significance. Under Nelson's supervision as the magistrate judge in the case, the parties reached a tentative agreement for a sweeping set of changes for the Minneapolis Police Department that ultimately fell through in the 11th hour.
Nelson had led a series of grueling, all-day settlement talks between lawyers for the officers and for the city and its police chief at the time. By July 2008, the parties were on the verge of a $2 million settlement that also included the addition of a new deputy police chief position focused on documenting and responding to reports of discrimination both within the department and in the community.
The tentative agreement included data collection about racially based policing and publication of that data; the Police Department's adherence to terms of a previously proposed federal consent decree; and ongoing court oversight to ensure the settlement agreement's terms were implemented and followed.
The case gave Nelson an inside view of policing in Minneapolis and what many characterize as its "institutional racism." But she eventually was forced to declare an impasse after the City Council refused to sign off on the plan.
Andrew Muller, an attorney for the four plaintiff officers, said that the city's attorneys had told his clients and Nelson that they would recommend approval of the settlement. But the council emerged from a closed-door meeting without voting. The case finally settled a year later but without the previously agreed upon policy changes.
"I think that if the settlement had been agreed upon we wouldn't see a lot of the things we're seeing today," said Ralph Remington, a former City Council member. "You would have had a different kind of city at that time. We would have been a model for the nation."