A lawsuit that might have upended how Minneapolis public housing units are regulated and inspected was dismissed by a Hennepin County judge Thursday.
The suit, brought two years ago by a public housing resident, alleged that residents of Minneapolis Public Housing Agency units are subject to substandard living conditions in a way that tenants of private rental units aren't.
Thursday's dismissal didn't appear to directly address those quality-of-living concerns, but rather the legal argument that MPHA residents are illegally treated differently; the judge ruled that they are not.
The suit attacked the fact that MPHA units aren't subject to the same city inspections that private rentals are.
The MPHA and the city defended their decadeslong policy of a different regimen for enforcing housing standards because the MPHA, unlike a private landlord, is subject to federal regulations by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which provides most of the MPHA's funding.
In Thursday's ruling, Hennepin County Judge Patrick D. Robben sided with the city and MPHA.
Robben called the policy, in which the MPHA doesn't actually need a rental license from the city, "a planning level decision made upon consideration of public policy and the effects of that policy on advancing the mission of the (city and MPHA)." That decision, he reasoned, could not be targeted with a lawsuit like the one filed in 2021 by Kimberly Lowry, who lived in an MPHA-managed house on 26th Avenue S.
Lowry's attorneys filed the lawsuit on her behalf, but also hoped to establish a class of plaintiffs who reside in public housing units.