WASHINGTON — Federal authorities are barred from conducting an ''unsupervised, wholesale search'' of electronic devices that they seized from a Washington Post reporter's Virginia home while investigating allegations that a Pentagon contractor illegally leaked classified information to the journalist, a magistrate judge ruled Tuesday.
U.S. Magistrate Judge William Porter said he will independently review the contents of Post reporter Hannah Natanson's devices instead of allowing a Justice Department ''filter team'' to perform a search. Porter said he balanced the need to protect Natanson's free speech rights with the government's duty to safeguard top secret national security information.
''The Court finds that seizing the totality of a reporter's electronic work product, including tools essential to ongoing newsgathering, constitutes a restraint on the exercise of First Amendment rights,'' he wrote.
The case has drawn national attention and scrutiny from press freedom advocates who say it reflects a more aggressive posture by the Justice Department toward leak investigations involving journalists.
Federal agents seized a phone, two laptops, a recorder, a portable hard drive and a Garmin smart watch when they searched Natanson's home in Alexandria, Virginia, on Jan. 14. Last month, Porter agreed to temporarily bar the government from reviewing any material from Natanson's devices. Tuesday's order extends that prohibition.
''The Court's genuine hope is that this search was conducted — as the government contends — to gather evidence of a crime in a single case, not to collect information about confidential sources from a reporter who has published articles critical of the administration,'' he wrote.
The Post sought an order requiring the government to immediately return the devices to its reporter, but Porter denied that request. He said it is reasonable for the government to keep nothing more than the ''limited information'' responsive to the search warrant. The rest of the contents must be returned to Natanson, he ruled.
Allowing the government to search a reporter's work material, including unrelated information from confidential sources, ''is the equivalent of leaving the government's fox in charge of the Washington Post's henhouse,'' Porter wrote.