Leslie Frazier's news conferences have become requiems. Soft-spoken by nature, Frazier for weeks now has quietly lamented his team's losses, sounding more defeated than defiant, and if there is a common denominator among most losing football coaches, it is defiance.
This week, Frazier did something rare for an NFL head coach. He invited criticism. Asked an innocuous question about the state of his team, Frazier said he was "more angry with myself in not being able to get us where we needed to be, so we wouldn't be 2-9."
He also said: "In this league, there are no excuses."
Frazier is right to blame himself, and right not to beg for mercy. His first team should be better than 2-9. When evaluating his rookie season, though, it's important to recognize that this team shouldn't be a whole lot better.
With sharper coaching, the Vikings might have held on to one or two of their early-season leads. Maybe they would be 3-8 or 4-7, but those extra victories would be like gauze on a camera shooting a closeup of Steve Buscemi. You know he's ugly. He knows he's ugly. Why fake it?
What's important for this organization is to find the cause of ineptitude, not a scapegoat for it. The difference between Frazier and the Vikings' front office is that Frazier is unproven, while the front office has proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that it is not adept at building a deep roster.
Rick Spielman is the Vikings' chief personnel guru. He is in the crosshairs, but owner Zygi Wilf is just as culpable for bad decisions because he has failed to install a general manager, making the front office an amorphous committee.
Spielman and his crew have generally made good use of their first-round draft picks, landing Chad Greenway, Adrian Peterson, Jared Allen (via trade), Percy Harvin and Christian Ponder since 2006.