Jeff Johnson: Why I'm voting to keep the name 'Lake Calhoun'

The full Hennepin County Board will be voting soon on whether to rename Lake Calhoun in Minneapolis to Bde Maka Ska, Dakota words meaning "Lake White Earth."

The argument of those advocating the change: John C. Calhoun, a vice president and secretary of state in the early 1800s, was a supporter of slavery. The effort to change the name of Lake Calhoun is in line with similar campaigns throughout the country to rename buildings, schools and streets based on the objectionable beliefs of their namesakes.

I do not intend to vote for the name change. Unlike some opponents of the change, I'm not concerned that the proposed name is hard to pronounce, and my decision didn't hinge on the fact that homeowners near the lake are largely opposed to the change. I just don't believe this frenzy to rename structures, remove plaques or tear down monuments accomplishes anything.

The change would, however, cause some problems — and costs — to the many businesses and organizations near the lake that bear Calhoun's name. And it certainly would lead to a new push to rename Calhoun Parkway.

But it wouldn't change history or advance society in any way.

Despite Calhoun's many accomplishments (including the establishing of Fort Snelling), I don't make any effort to defend him. His views were fundamentally contrary to my belief that every human being is created in the image of God.

Unfortunately, several great American leaders of the past held these same views, which were common in their time.

That's a lot of schools, streets, buildings and cities to rename. And, of course, Mount Rushmore will need to go.

And lest you think that is hyperbole, I saw it firsthand at the County Board's public hearing on this issue.

Most of the people in attendance supported the name change, but there were a few opponents. One such opponent argued sarcastically that he would not rest until every street and building in Minnesota was cleansed of names like Washington and Jefferson — and he received the most raucous cheers of any speaker.

The speaker was clearly being sarcastic. The crowd was not.

Once we start this, it will not end.

Rather than focus on name changes, we should teach our children about America's history — both the great and the terrible. Trying to scrub any mention of leaders who supported what was sadly acceptable to many in their time accomplishes nothing other than further dividing our country.