Commentary
They say this is the best time of the year for spectator sports. March Madness, spring baseball and, of course, the Masters.
Yet for sheer drama, what could be more fun than watching Minnesota liberals twist, contort and massage the data from the Department of Revenue's biennial Tax Incidence Study?
OK, OK -- maybe it's not quite as exciting as Phil Mickelson's miraculous shot on the back nine at Augusta last year, but this part of the great Minnesota tax debate is always the most entertaining.
Every two years the department releases its study, ostensibly designed to show the state's overall tax burden. And every two years, the tax-and-spend crowd proclaims that the rich are getting off easy.
Gov. Mark Dayton and his fellow "progressives" have been busy pointing to the study in support of their $3 billion tax hike on the state's top 5 percent of income earners.
Not only has the governor proposed raising the top rate to 10.95 percent (higher than California or New York), but he initially wanted an additional 3 percent surcharge for those with incomes above $500,000 -- giving Minnesota the highest state income tax rate in the nation.
Forgetting for a moment the massive amounts of business income these taxes will hit (revenue from non-C corporations flows to individual tax returns) -- even then, the premise upon which this class warfare is based remains fundamentally flawed.