Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Perhaps with the unrelenting volume from one screaming news cycle after the next, you failed to note this week that after an extensive, exhaustive, meticulously deliberate investigation, the Jan. 6 committee's public hearings into last year's Capitol riot have crept within ... a month.
I know, what's the hurry, right?
The Washington Post has already won a Pulitzer for its comprehensive riot coverage, the forces behind it, the systemic failures that preceded it, the persistent threat from elements of moral rot at its core, the caustic social aftermath, and the implications for an embattled democracy. But the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol is still agonizing over the question of whether it wants to talk with Rudy Giuliani, last of the red-hot Trump psycho litigants.
It doesn't, in this view, nor should it have any interest in chatting with the former president, at least if its stated mission remains getting to the truth of the matter, or any matter. Having Donald Trump check in from Mar-a-Lago for an extended Zoom round of "Liar Liar" has zero utility.
Fortunately, we're told that the committee has so much testimony from nearly 1,000 witnesses and more than 100,000 documents that it doesn't regard Trump's testimony to be terribly necessary. An Associated Press summation of the investigation's status on Monday included the following:
"The panel, comprised of seven Democrats and two Republicans, has said that the evidence it has compiled is enough to link Trump to a federal crime."