After 10 days of vacation in an isolated cottage on a Cape Cod salt marsh, it's hard to return to the world of COVID-19 and stark political warfare.
I'm catching up with the uprising in Belarus, along with the Democratic National Convention and the latest White House conspiracy theories.
But, for me, the most fascinating story that broke while I was away was in the Mideast — the pledge by Israel and the United Arab Emirates to move toward fully normal relations, in exchange for Israel's suspending the planned annexation of a third of the occupied West Bank.
If the deal is fulfilled, this rich emirate with a population of 9.6 million on the northeast end of the Arab Gulf will become the third Arab state to recognize Israel (long after Egypt and Jordan). Others, like the tiny Gulf kingdom of Bahrain, the sultanate of Oman, and Sudan, may follow. Some are billing the pact, brokered by the Trump administration, as a geopolitical earthquake.
Having covered the Mideast for decades, I'm far more cautious about overhyping expectations. Here are my initial thoughts:
1. The UAE move, no matter how significant, won't transform history or the region.
When Egyptian President Anwar Sadat's plane landed in Tel Aviv in November 1977, that did remake the region. I was fortunate enough to be at the airport when he landed; I was standing on wooden risers as Sadat embraced Golda Meir several rows below, and an Israeli foreign ministry official wept beside me. Egypt's subsequent peace treaty with Israel, which still holds, ended the conventional Arab threat to Israel, since the most powerful Arab army had taken itself off the battlefield.
That was a geopolitical earthquake.
But the UAE has never fought Israel. And Jerusalem confronts very different threats now than in the days of front-line Arab armies, notably from missiles provided by Iran to Hezbollah in Lebanon.