Ten years and a pair of preschoolers into their New Brighton starter home, Jaci and Scott Schloesser decided they were ready to make the big jump.
They had the money for a bigger place, and last May they abandoned the suburbs and moved into a St. Paul home full of traditional character, minutes from brewpubs, bookstores and trendy chefs. "We just love it here," Jaci said.
The Schloessers' move reversed the traditional version of the American dream, in which upwardly mobile families flee the city for the cul-de-sacs of the suburbs. But there are growing signs that the path from suburban to urban is one more and more young couples are preparing to follow — with immense consequences for both cities and suburbs.
"Suburbs were conceived, created and built for families," said Leigh Gallagher, author of a new book called "The End of the Suburbs." "That was true in the 'Leave it to Beaver' era of the '50s, and it was true in the McMansion era in 2000. The one thing that was consistent was, 'This is where we go to have a family.' "
"For that now to change is threatening suburban communities in a big way."
Between 2011 and 2012, the number of households in Minneapolis and St. Paul with school-aged children is estimated to have shot up by nearly 7,000, as the number with seniors was dropping by close to 4,000, said research analyst Jane Tigan of St. Paul's Wilder Research, an arm of the Amherst H. Wilder Foundation that studies social, cultural and economic trends affecting poor and disadvantaged Minnesotans.
In the suburbs, meanwhile, Tigan reported, the number with seniors rose by nearly 15,000, as those with children flatlined — part of a massive demographic role reversal.
New year-end data from the Builders Association of the Twin Cities suggest that for the second straight year, residential construction in Minneapolis towered over that of any Twin Cities suburb — something that hasn't happened in decades.