It has the best of lakes, it has the worst of lakes.
Carver County scored four A grades and six F grades this spring in the Metropolitan Council's annual report on water quality in metro-area lakes.
In the Met Council's findings, Carver stands out because it had more F-graded lakes than any other county, but also had more As than most. However, because the study measured only 180 of the metro area's 950 lakes, comparisons among counties may be misleading. The Met Coucil evaluated relatively few lakes in some areas, such as Anoka County. Other metro lakes are monitored by watershed organizations, counties, soil and water conservation districts and the state.
Still, Carver County's mix of As and Fs offer a lesson in how widely lakes, even in close proximity, can vary. Conditions in and immediately surrounding a lake, especially the human activity on its shores, determine its health.
"Every lake has its own story," said Madeline Seveland, education coordinator for Carver's Water Management Organization (WMO).
Condtions that influence lake water quality include landscape as well as its dimensions and history. Deeper lakes fare better because harmful materials settle to the bottom rather than mingle with the water.
Before regulations were tightened in the 1980s, stormwater and untreated sewage were dumped into some lakes, practices that continue to impair some lakes. Carp feeding on lake floors can set loose pollutants that swish through the water.
But the biggest factor is human activity onshore. Farms, industrial areas, parking lots and lawns can throw a lake's natural ecosystem out of whack.