Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Many Americans are angry — at government, at our representatives and at each other. We increasingly distrust public institutions, feel powerless and fear for the future. We thrash, argue, and put our heads in the sand, hoping that somehow "this too, shall pass."
However, one group of citizens rarely feels this way — instead, they feel hopeful and empowered. These are newly naturalized "citizens by choice." As a federal judge for more than 28 years, I have presided over naturalization ceremonies in my home state of Colorado and in my adopted state of Minnesota. I have seen thousands of immigrants solemnly take their citizenship oath, then — wearing broad smiles and waving American flags — hurry to tables where they can register to vote. Their joy at being American citizens is contagious, inspiring even the most cynical onlooker.
Why is the outlook of newly naturalized citizens so positive? Why do they revel in being Americans when so many of us do not?
Although every person has individual reasons, there is a fundamental difference between these two groups. Naturalized citizens study American history and civics, proving their knowledge by passing a required citizenship test. The naturalization test has 100-plus questions, 10 of which are asked during an applicant's final interview. Almost all naturalized citizens pass the test on their first try.
In contrast, "citizens by birth" need not study nor prove their knowledge of American history or civics. Indeed, only 40% can successfully pass the naturalization test. This deficit traces back to the 1970s, when history and civics instruction was reduced, eliminated or subordinated to science and math education. As a result, in 2010 and 2018, the National Assessment of Education Progress found that not even 25% of high school graduates were proficient with civics concepts. States responded with new standards, and private and governmental entities created new educational resources, but they were all directed to students, not the adults who already missed out on critical instruction.
The scope of the civics deficit is staggering. Those who entered high school between 1975 and 2010 now range from 26 to 61 — the bulk of today's voting age public. Although not everyone in this age range is ignorant of civics, surveys repeatedly demonstrate that many do not know the fundamentals.