How very special (K)

February 4, 2009 at 7:59PM

How very special (K) Mr. Tidbit knows he has already ranted -- frequently -- about wildly overpriced packaging of grocery products in boxes of single-portion or 100-calorie (or 90-calorie) packs. And he also knows he has already ranted -- frequently (but not recently) -- about Kellogg's Special K products. In those "Special K" rants, he points out that "Special K" does not signify that the product in question is similar nutritionally to Kellogg's vitamin- and mineral-enhanced Special K cereal. "Special K," Mr. Tidbit notes, is simply a brand name, and it implies nothing about the nutritional profile of the various products so named.

Today Mr. Tidbit is delighted to report on a new product, Special K crackers, that allows him to do a rare combined double-rant.

Let's take the brand-name thing first: A serving of original Special K cereal is fortified with 35 to 100 percent of the daily values of nine vitamins and minerals and from 4 to 15 percent of four others. A serving of Special K crackers has 4 percent of the daily value of one of those vitamins and minerals and 0 percent of 12 of them.

And: Special K crackers are available in an 8-ounce box or a box of six 90-calorie bags (totaling 4.62 ounces). They sell for the same price, so the 90-calorie bags cost 73 percent more per ounce.

But that's not all. The front of the 8-ounce box carries a "90 calories" badge, which adds, in smaller type, "per 17 crackers." But the side of the box has two sets of nutrition information -- for a serving of 17 crackers (22 grams) and for a serving of 24 crackers (30 grams, which contains 120 calories).

A note on the side panel offers this puzzling explanation: "Why two serving sizes? We suggest a 90-calorie serving for a satisfying snack to keep you on track." Apparently they had to offer the 24-cracker analysis, for gluttons.

AL SICHERMAN

about the writer

about the writer

Al Sicherman

Columnist

See Moreicon

More from No Section

See More
FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
Melissa Golden/The New York Times

It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.