One of the nastiest fights of the recent legislative session came over a proposal to dramatically broaden the state sales tax to include clothing and numerous consumer and business services.
The idea was to use the money to reduce the overall sales tax rate and then pay for other spending, like property tax relief.
Scorching criticism caused DFL Gov. Mark Dayton to ditch the plan early in a legislative session that left Minnesota's sales tax system largely unchanged. Democrats and Republicans have long criticized that system, which has a relatively high tax rate but includes among the narrowest range of goods and services in the nation.
The proof is in the numbers.
The 9,500 businesses in Minneapolis logged $22 billion in sales in 2011, but less than $7 billion of that was taxable, state records show. All told, consumers in the state's most populous city paid about $516 million in state sales and use taxes (use taxes are generally collected from out-of-state purchases, like through the Internet).
St. Paul's numbers were about half that.
The city of Bloomington — home of the Mall of America — was the third-highest collector of state sales taxes. Bloomington businesses had about $10 billion in annual sales, collecting $192 million in state sales and use taxes, even without a tax on clothing.
Some cities on the Iron Range had the smallest volume of sales in the state.