The Minnesota State High School League is poised to vote Thursday on a proposal that would establish first-ever guidelines in the state for transgender students to take part in high school sports.
The proposal spells out medical documentation that students must provide to identify themselves as transgender, including evidence of hormone therapy, surgery and parental or guardian consent. The plan also has guidelines for how schools should accommodate privacy concerns in locker room areas.
The league said it drafted the proposal with help from OutFront Minnesota, which advocates for transgender issues, to keep in step with societal changes and give its nearly 500 member schools guidance on how to handle them. League Executive Director Dave Stead said the NCAA and 32 states already have "some sort of policy or procedure" in place regarding transgender student-athlete participation.
But the plan has ignited significant outcry and opposition. A scheduled league vote in early August was postponed amid a flurry of criticism, including a letter from the Minnesota Family Council, a Christian-based advocacy group that tries to promote and defend biblical principles in public policy matters, urging that it be rejected.
This week the Mankato-based Child Protection League Action paid for a full-page advertisement on the back page of the Star Tribune's Sunday sports section spelling out concerns about the plan. It urged parents to contact high school league representatives before Wednesday, when a league workshop is set to hear from the public on the issue.
The group describes itself on its website as a lobbying group seeking to protect children from "exploitation, indoctrination and violence.'' State coordinator Michele Lentz said her group "categorically rejects the underlying premise of the policy that gender is a matter of choice and not biology."
Lentz added, "We don't see the transgender student themselves as dangerous. But other kids who might lack maturity could make situations in the locker room dangerous."
The ad, on the heels of a similar e-mail from the group last week, set off a social media storm of commentary on Twitter and other forums.