Lorraine Anderson's hip hurt so badly that the 82-year-old couldn't get out of a chair in her southeast Minneapolis house. But she didn't want to go to the doctor.
"She was afraid they'd make her move out of her home," said Jean Gotfredson, a volunteer from Nokomis Healthy Seniors.
Healthy Seniors promised Anderson that if she sought medical care, they would do whatever they could to keep her living independently. And they did. Today, three months after a hip transplant, Anderson remains in the house where she has lived for 49 years.
To stay in her home, Anderson depends on Nokomis Healthy Seniors, one of 43 local programs in Minnesota's Living at Home Network. Using thousands of volunteers to do simple household tasks, the network kept 1,222 elderly Minnesotans out of nursing homes in 2008-09, its leaders say, and provided them healthy, safe living options.
Caring for those same clients in nursing homes would have cost an additional $20 million -- much of it borne by taxpayers -- the network's leaders say. Multiply that by the thousands of other frail, elderly Minnesotans -- a number that will skyrocket with the graying of Minnesota in the next two decades -- and the sums grow large.
"The need [for long-term care] is growing," said Dale Gandrud, a member of the board of Steele County Healthy Seniors in southern Minnesota. "Funding is going down. This is a way to multiply the dollars we have."
Some experts question the network's savings estimate -- and its adaptability. "For a program to be an alternative to nursing home care, it has to be systematic," said Dr. Robert Kane, a long-term care specialist at the University of Minnesota. In the Living at Home Network, he said, "people aren't chosen on the basis of need, but on the basis of geography."
As that debate continues, everyone agrees that Minnesota must do something to keep its exploding elderly population out of nursing homes for as long as possible to curtail the crushing costs of extended institutional care.