Editor's note: Bill MK is a die-hard supporter of both Minnesota United FC and lower level soccer everywhere. He currently writes at www.therelegated.org about Minnesota United and other topics in soccer, and can be found on Twitter: @bill_mk.
Every week, he writes a tactical analysis of the United match, which he has graciously allowed to republish here. This originally appeared at The Relegated, which we think you should visit. Also: What better time to read about tactics, than the day of the match?
Minnesota United FC beat Indy Eleven 3-2 on a brisk and windy night. While the margin was 1-0, both Indy goals were caused by mistakes by United players. One was an own goal by Simone Bracallello, and the other was on a penalty kick after a handball in the box by Jamie Watson. The fact that these wide midfielders were so far back playing defense shows a tactical shift on the part of Minnesota from their first few games, which their formation made apparent.
The Formation: 4-4-1-1 or 4-2-3-1?
Defense: Davis, Dias, Calvano, Venegas
Midfield: Bracallello, Pitchkolan, Vincentini, Mendes
Forwards: Ibarra, Ramirez
Watson and Omar Daley found themselves on the bench, after struggling to help advance the ball against Edmonton. Also, Floyd Franks was on bench with the return of Juliano Vincentini. Looking over the starting line-up, the formation was listed as a 4-4-1-1, whereas in the first three games, the lineup was listed as a 4-2-3-1. Against Indy, the team's formation appeared to have changed. (If you are interested in learning more about the 4-2-3-1, I wrote a brief article about the basics of the formation.)
In some ways though, the difference between a 4-4-1-1 and a 4-2-3-1 is meaningless; the only difference lies in the wide midfielders pushing up farther, in the 4-2-3-1. At times during the game, Minnesota shifted back and forth between the two formations.
There were even times on the attack when the formation became a 3-4-3, with the fullback bringing the ball up past the midfield line. This ability to change tactics as the flow of the game dictates is one of the reasons that Minnesota has been able to so quickly shift from defense to offense and find success on the counter-attack - without being caught out of position defensively.