Dear Carolyn: Ever since my two sons were born (now 19 and 16), my father has sent a modest monetary gift on their birthdays and Christmas. He is a wealthy man and it was just lovely that he thought of them.
This Christmas, my father sent me a chatty e-mail explaining that he would not be sending my older son a Christmas gift because it was his policy not to send gifts to anyone over 18.
The whole thing is odd because I've exchanged Christmas gifts with him and his wife every year.
I was very hurt by this and embarrassed by his lack of generosity. My children only have one grandfather, and although they do not get to see him very often, there is deep affection for him. In my mind, the birthday and Christmas gifts signified that he cared about them and remembered them at these special moments during the year.
I could talk to my father and let him know that I am flummoxed by his lack of generosity. However, I'm not sure what good it would do. He will be hurt and defensive. I also sense that he might withdraw even further from engaging with our family. I would appreciate your advice.
Carolyn says: Is this what you want to teach your sons, that monetary gifts signify love and the absence of them warrants pressure for their return?
Maybe it's odd that you're over 18 and still get gifts from your father, but people have an inalienable right to be odd. (And they seem to exercise it most with their money, don't they?)
Since your sons feel a "deep affection" for their grandfather, your primary mandate is not to screw that up. Break the news to them that Grandpa's gifts stop with their 18th birthdays — with not a molecule of disapproval in your breath — and, as befitting this arrival at adulthood, you recommend they use the occasion to approach the relationship as adults. Where they've been conditioned to receive, they can now take the initiative to stay in touch with their only grandfather. To suggest they do otherwise would betray an embarrassing lack of generosity.