A much-anticipated $800 million public-works package by House Republicans failed by 12 votes on Thursday, leaving the fate of dozens of construction projects and other budget priorities in limbo with three days left until this year's session ends.
Legislative leaders reported little progress on major budget priorities such as transportation and bonding as high-stakes negotiations continued ahead of Monday's adjournment.
The Republicans' bonding proposal was defeated quickly, 69 to 64, after a short debate, no amendments and little DFL support. DFLers are demanding more money for bonding and were disappointed that House Republicans included a lot of road and bridge funding that they felt should be included in a separate transportation measure.
"Minnesotans know we need road and bridge repairs, water quality infrastructure improvements, and funding for our higher education institutions," said Rep. Paul Torkelson, R-Hanska, who is chairman of the bonding committee. "It was disappointing to hear Democrats claim this bill includes too many road and bridge projects — I think Minnesotans believe roads and bridges are a priority, and know these projects deserve support."
A bipartisan group of House and Senate negotiators called a meeting for Friday morning to piece together a new bonding package, one with a mix of projects from proposals by DFL Gov. Mark Dayton, Senate DFLers and Republicans who control the House.
"There are many areas of agreement between us, and I look forward to finding common ground in order to help create jobs and get critical projects across the state the funding they need," said Sen. LeRoy Stumpf, DFL-Plummer, the Senate chairman of the committee.
House Minority Leader Paul Thissen, DFL-Minneapolis, and other DFL leaders have steadfastly criticized Republicans for not including them in negotiations for a bonding package.
"The right way to pass a bonding bill is by working together on a bill that reflects the needs and priorities of all Minnesotan in all regions of the state," Thissen said during the floor debate. "This bill is about the best politics for your caucus, the Republicans, not the best interest of all Minnesotans."