Commentary
As the legislative debate about state funding for the University of Minnesota begins in earnest, allow me to share an experience I had last week while representing the U at an academic conference in Washington, D.C.
During a lunch break, I struck up a conversation with a colleague from Ohio who, as it turns out, once spent a semester teaching in Minnesota about 20 years ago.
"You know," he said, "at that time, there was absolutely no question that Minnesota was a vastly superior institution to Ohio State. But today, I doubt anyone would feel that way, not just at OSU but almost anywhere in the Big Ten. What's going on up there?"
Sadly, this is a question with a very simple answer: What's going on is that the state of Minnesota, without really even having a debate about the subject, has decided that funding a public research university is no longer something it cares to do.
I know that we are in the midst of a terrible budget crisis, that we are all feeling the pain, and that everyone, at some level, is convinced that they are being asked to bear an unfair share of the burden.
And in all honesty, since I am not an expert on state finances or budgetary policy, I really have no way to know if state spending is truly "out of control," as some vociferously claim, or if we are simply suffering the effects of a very deep recession.
But as a member of the U faculty, I do know something about my own institution, and at least this much I am prepared to state with certainty: If the state does have a "spending problem" and not a "revenue problem," it is certainly not because of the U.