As you read this, I'll be sitting in a deer stand in Wisconsin, hoping for the best. Either that, or the best already will have happened, and I'll have a deer down. Regardless, my 18-year-old son, Cole, will be nearby, hunting with me out of a shack not far from Cumberland, Wis.
That Cole is now a high school senior seems a bigger deal to me than when his older brother, Trevor, now 20 and away at college, was the same age.
With Trevor's expected departure, I knew I still had Cole to hunt and fish with for a few years. Now I'm on the cusp of going afield more often without them — an uneasy prospect.
Over the boys' lifetimes, I've given quite a bit of thought to the worth of exposing them to outdoor pursuits, and how best to do it, assuming they had an interest.
The issue — nationally, at least, though less so in Minnesota — of declining hunting and fishing participation among young people is among primary threats facing North American conservation.
A continued falloff in young people who go afield not only undercuts hunting and fishing but fish and wildlife themselves. In the United States, hunters and anglers traditionally have paid the brunt of their management, and the acquisition of their habitats, through license fees.
So, today, I offer some thoughts on exposing kids to outdoor pursuits, based on my experiences.
I do so recognizing that we're all different, with varying interests in various activities. Some kids wouldn't hunt or fish if you paid them. Which is fine.