Three days after posting a video that included acomparison between the food stamp program and feeding wild animals, state Rep. Mary Franson shared photos of some of the hate mail she has received.
Hot Dish asked Franson, R-Alexandria, about the messages in those emails and her thoughts about food stamps and welfare.
What follow is that exchange.
Q: Are you frightened for yourself and your family?
A: "I think the issue is that some of these emails are coming from anonymous sources. I don't know where they are. So they have been reported to the local sheriff. Am I concerned about my safety and my children? Well, there is a person in my district that has already decided that he's going to start protesting my house, and my children are just a couple of houses away in day care, so that's concerning. The sheriffs are well aware of this individual too, so as far as safety, I don't even know how to respond to that. I'm hoping that if they're so anonymous that they can't put their name to an email they're not going to be able to actually do what it is they want to do...You know, they're not even talking about the issues. If they're upset, talk about the issues. Name calling, vulgar name calling?"
Q: It looked like you apologized on Twitter over the weekend.
A: "I apologized. I apologized for offending. What I should have done is maybe elaborated a little bit more on my intent. My intent is, I don't want people to be poor. I don't want them living on assistance. What I want them to do is to be able to stand on their own two feet. When you have five years of welfare, five years isn't enough to get on your feet? There's something wrong. I want them to be successful. The more successful that Minnesota is, the more successful our state is going to be as well. The question is, you can lead a horse to water, you can't make him drink. And there are numerous people that use it for the intent, just to get back on their feet, a temporary setback. It's those people that decide that's what they want to do, they want government to provide for them, there's something wrong with that. So there is no way—What I was reading was a forward. It wasn't something that I came up with myself. I was not saying poor people are like animals, at all. It was just an analogy of becoming dependent, and we don't want people to become dependent on the government. Especially when our federal government is dead broke. What happens if they decide they're going to cut food support? What are people going to do to provide for themselves?"
Q: Does it make you more careful about what you say in your legislative updates?