Do the Vikings have a winning formula that features a running back in his 30s?
Oh, I don't know. They went 6-9 and missed the playoffs without Adrian Peterson last year. This year, they went 11-5 and won the NFC North with Adrian Peterson capturing the league rushing title and All-Pro first-team honors behind an offensive line that lost two starters in August and struggled throughout the season.
You'd think that kind of logic would silence an argument. But Vikings fans are a tormented band of brothers. With good reason, as we saw once again Sunday.
They're hurting, again, and they want to share their pain. Next to Blair Walsh's missed 27-yard field-goal attempt with 22 seconds left, Peterson's fourth-quarter fumble ranks No. 2 on the Purple Pain-O-Meter that runneth over. It was that fumble that handed Seattle a 12-yard drive that produced the go-ahead field goal in the Vikings' 10-9 NFC wild-card loss.
Speaking for those who have suggested on occasion that Peterson ain't half bad, it took less than one rising sun for the cyber pitchforks to arrive at the pillow. And away we go with what likely will be a popular offseason story line. Again.
Peterson is bad for the offense and the team, they said. He can't be trusted with the ball, they said. He's stunting Teddy Bridgewater's growth, they said. And, of course, Peterson must be cut or traded because he's making too much money, they said.
In a strange sort of way, this is good news to Peterson's teammates.
"I think Adrian has shown that he thrives on doubt," fullback Zach Line said. "So the more people who doubt him, I think the better off we'll be next year when he's 31."