With so many major food companies headquartered in Minnesota, it’s no surprise the state has three times the concentration of food scientists and technologists as the national average.
That must make for some great dinner parties.
“All of my friends in Minneapolis work in food in some way or another, and everyone is an amazing cook,” said Cassee Cain, a senior R&D process engineer at Cargill. “The potlucks are incredible, because everybody understands the reactions that need to take place so the food tastes good.”
Yet outside those circles, there remains an aura of mystery around food science, especially as social media overflows with misinformation about food and health that can lead to hostility toward the industry.
“Food scientists can sometimes get a bad rap, and don’t get me wrong, there is a lot of Frankenfood out there,” said food scientist and industry veteran Jeni Ellick, founder and CEO of Artisan Row. “But food science is what keeps products safe, tasty and meeting specific needs for all kinds of eaters.”
The broader food industry’s ultimate goal — selling more food — is often at odds with public health goals, however. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has vowed to go after food additives and ultra-processed food as the head of the federal Department of Health and Human Services.
Yet without some processing, and certain ingredients, the safety and affordability of the nation’s food supply would be at risk.
“We’ve gotten used to a steady supply of diverse and relatively affordable foods that are readily available around the clock,” said Job Ubbink, head of the Food Science and Nutrition Department at the University of Minnesota. “We’re exceptional. That was not the case even 70, 80 years ago around the U.S., and as a society, we’ve come to take that for granted.