St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman calls the recently approved 2015 city budget a "keep the momentum going" spending plan, in part because it will help fund amenities such as bike paths and expanded green space.
Although this page is disappointed that the budget OK'd this week by the City Council will require a 2.4 percent property tax levy increase, the council's support for most of Coleman's budget wish list is an indication that city leaders are on the same page.
The $103.6 million levy translates into about a $16 tax hike on a median-valued St. Paul home of $145,000, not including tax increases due to property-value shifts and taxes imposed by the county and the school district.
Given Coleman's flat levy proposal last year — and residents' concerns about rising taxes — we had hoped that trend could continue. However, the 2.4 percent levy increase will close a $9.6 million deficit and fix a number of city streets that are desperately in need of repair.
The mayor and council did differ on one issue: The council approved using $345,000 in economic development funds to expand library hours. Coleman says he will use his veto pen on that item — not because he opposes more library hours, but because he disagrees on the funding source. The funds come from a one-time-use pot of money, and he is concerned that the city might not be able to sustain the additional hours in years to come.
Coleman likely will lose that argument, though, because the council approved the measure on a veto-proof 6-1 vote.
It's encouraging to see that the $515 million budget includes $54 million for road repair, including fixing what Coleman calls the "Terrible 20.'' That nickname refers to 20 major, heavily traveled city roads that were in terrible condition after last year's severe winter. The funds will be used to repair some of the streets and replace the worst ones.
The budget also gives the green light to Coleman's 8-80 fund, a $42 million program to invest in livability amenities such as bike paths, green space and renovations to the Palace Theater. Some council members had pushed back on those proposals during budget discussions, arguing that the money would be better spent on basics such as public safety and roads.