ST. CLOUD – The trial Brian G. Fitch, who stands accused of gunning down Mendota Heights police officer Scott Patrick last summer and of shooting at three St. Paul police officers trying to capture him, got off to a wild start Tuesday when one juror was excused and another hurriedly seated before the entire trial was put on hold for two days over explosive new evidence.
The twists and turns came one after another on what should have been the day that prosecutors made their opening statements. The state's case will now be heard Thursday morning when the trial resumes. Dakota County District Court Judge Mary Theisen ordered a break Tuesday afternoon to give Fitch's defense team time to examine an alleged confession by Fitch that prosecutors say they learned of just last week.
It was the latest example of what defense attorney Lauri Traub has called unacceptably late filings of evidence in the case, and this time she said she wanted the evidence excluded, the trial delayed, or a mistrial called if she couldn't get either of the first two.
"It appears the state isn't ready to go to trial," she told the court. "They made a speedy trial demand and they're continuing to do investigation when the trial has already started."
The day got off to an unscripted start when Theisen said she learned that a juror had become fearful of serving on the case after her job was made public in media reports, potentially identifying her.
The juror, who was known in court only as juror 44, said her daughter contacted her Friday after seeing reports that published details of the woman's job dispensing medicine in the Stearns County jail. The woman had even dispensed pills to Fitch last week before she was placed on the jury, a coincidence reported by several media outlets, including the Star Tribune.
"It scares me to death now that everybody knows," the woman told Theisen on Tuesday morning when she was asked about her state of mind. Theisen excused the juror and apologized to her before putting the court in recess. Her dismissal set off a scramble to find a final juror that lasted until early afternoon. Six prospective jurors were interviewed and excused. The seventh person questioned, juror 74, was seated, restoring the jury to 14 people.
Juror 44 was the second seated juror excused over safety concerns. A juror last week said she feared for her safety after potentially identifying details about her job were published by a television station. She was excused Friday and a replacement was found the same day.