From daylong bus tours to daybreak rallies, Republicans and Democrats are fanning out across Minnesota this weekend in a frenzied final push of an election season that is bound to have major consequences for the state.
Republicans spent Saturday putting miles on their cars and pleading for last-minute dollars in hopes of hardening their control of the Legislature. DFLers knocked on doors and embarked on a bus tour to try to wrestle back control and chart a new course for the state.
Meanwhile, supporters and opponents of proposed constitutional amendments that would limit marriage to heterosexuals and require voters to have an approved ID to cast a ballot were trying to break through to Minnesotans who've not already made up their minds.
The campaign within the state also is taking on new importance at the national level. GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney is placing a new emphasis on Minnesota. His running mate, Paul Ryan, has made recent visits to the state and plans another Sunday, while independent political groups have unleashed a blizzard of TV ads blasting President Obama. The president, meanwhile, deployed former President Bill Clinton in the state to help nail down its 10 electoral votes, which have been seen as more likely to go the president's way and could prove crucial in a close election.
For both sides, there was little doubt of the importance the election holds for the state and the country. "If you get the DFL majority in the House and Senate, I'll shine your shoes, I'll press your coats, I'll take your exams for you," DFL Gov. Mark Dayton said at a rally last week with Clinton at the University of Minnesota. "I'll do whatever you need me to do."
Final fight over marriage
Topping $16 million in spending by both sides, the battle over the proposed marriage amendment is the most expensive and divisive ballot question in state history.
Staffers from Minnesotans United for All Families were crisscrossing the state in an RV emblazoned with "Vote No" stickers, urging voters to defeat the measure that would have the state Constitution define marriage as between one man and one woman.