The Minneapolis school district spends more than $1 million a year on copying and printing, and firms compete for that business.
On Tuesday, a Minneapolis company that lost its bid to provide the district with copying equipment and service took the competition to Hennepin County District Court, accusing the district of showing favoritism, violating public contract law and costing Minneapolis taxpayers a lot of money.
Imaging Path charged that the district's new purchasing director, Gary Anderson, favored Ricoh Americas Corp. before bidding began. Imaging Path says selecting Ricoh will cost at least $600,000 more over five years.
The district fired back that it broke no laws, picked the best company and went with a bid that was only slightly more costly. Corey Ayling, the district's lawyer, said the deal with Ricoh will cost the district only $573 more a month. He said one reason for Ricoh's higher cost is that Imaging Path proposed 46 copiers for the district's two office buildings, while Ricoh proposed 65.
"This was a rational, non-arbitrary process," Ayling said.
Judge Denise Reilly said she'll rule by week's end on a request for temporary restraining order that would block the deal.
The school board approved the new contract Tuesday night, but it won't be signed until Reilly issues her decision, said district spokesman Stan Alleyne.
The district argued that courts have ruled that judges are not experts on bidding processes, and unless there's an illegal or capricious process, which there was not, Reilly should not intervene.