TOWN OF ST. JOSEPH, WIS. – Just a few miles east of the busy St. Croix River bridge construction, Ed Gillstrom sits in his farm kitchen, poring over financial documents that condemn his land for a new highway leading to the bridge.
"I made it very clear that I'm not trying to stop the bridge, but they're taking a fine piece of land and I want to be compensated for it," said Gillstrom, who was born on the land his Swedish immigrant grandparents bought in 1894. "The nicest piece of land in St. Croix County is carved up, it's worthless."
Work on the $676 million bridge project has proceeded faster on the Washington County side of the river, where land acquisitions were minimal. But in St. Joseph, negotiations will continue into late summer to buy land for a three-mile stretch of four-lane highway.
Seven properties needed for the road, most of them south of County Road E, have been purchased for $1.68 million. The Gillstrom land and one other property in St. Joseph were taken by condemnation, also known as eminent domain, for nearly $1 million.
According to Wisconsin Department of Transportation records, Gillstrom was paid $325,000 for 18.29 acres of farmland and a temporary easement where a highway interchange will be built. He said he was told of condemnation by registered mail despite his appeal to the agency for further negotiations. He had asked the agency to pay him damages for what he said was diminished value on his remaining land, which he had planned to sell for housing parcels for his retirement income.
"I can't see that they tried even to be fair with me," he said last week, describing how the condemned land took away the main road into his remaining property. "They took all the right of way on County Road E away, which is worth its weight in gold."
'Not cheating anybody'
Nobody should assume that landowners weren't paid what they deserved, said Troy Staplemann, WisDOT's technical services supervisor in Eau Claire. "We're not trying to cheat anybody out of anything," he said. "We want to give them a fair price for their property."
Some landowners prefer condemnation because it offers a two-year window for appeal, Staplemann said. That wasn't the case with Gillstrom, who said his land was taken against his will. The other landowner whose property was condemned, Donald Anderson, didn't respond to an interview request.