The former Minneapolis police officer who lured adolescent girls into sexual encounters via social media was resentenced Thursday in Anoka County District Court after the Minnesota Court of Appeals overturned a previous lighter-than-recommended sentence.
Bradley Schnickel, now 34, was sentenced to 102 months in prison, taking into account good behavior and time served, meaning he has 32 more months to serve for the five felonies he pleaded guilty to in May 2014.
"I apologize … hearing the letters of these victims … I truly apologize," Schnickel told the packed courtroom.
After Judge James Cunningham read his new sentence, Schnickel bowed his head, then turned to look at his wife and his mother, who were seated right behind him.
In May 2014, Schnickel pleaded guilty to three counts of criminal or attempted criminal sexual conduct and two counts of electronic solicitation of a minor. He agreed to a plea deal with the Anoka County attorney's office that it would seek a nearly 12-year sentence. But Cunningham took a dramatic downward departure from state guidelines, which calls for 102 to 142 months in such cases, and sentenced Schnickel to 2½ years in prison, with a lifetime conditional-release term. Under that sentence, he would have been released in June.
The judge stated at the time that the sentences requested by the prosecution and Schnickel's attorney stood "in stark contrast to each other, and neither satisfies my sense of what is fair and what is just." He rejected the longer sentence because it "didn't take into account the work that this defendant has done to try to control these destructive urges and behaviors."
In an unusual move, the Anoka County attorney's office appealed Cunningham's sentence to the Minnesota Court of Appeals. That court rejected the lighter sentence on May 11, sending the case back to Anoka County for resentencing.
The Appeals Court said a lower-court judge may depart from the sentencing guidelines only if there are substantial and compelling reasons to support departure. It ruled that Cunningham used improper offender-related factors to support his departure. The main reason he gave for the departure from sentencing guidelines was Schnickel's amenability to probation, remorse and acceptance of responsibility.