During last week's GOP presidential debate, several candidates drew applause by calling for the elimination of the federal Department of Education.
It's not a new argument, nor is it a good one. Since the department was separated from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare during the Carter administration, critics of federal policymaking have made it a favorite piñata.
Attacking federal departments may be popular in some quarters, but when the future of our nation's schools is at stake, such talk is irresponsible.
Doing away with the department would end the federal government's role in K-12 education despite current and historical evidence that public education is made better by federal oversight.
A number of landmark policies in public education were developed by the federal government, especially in the areas of civil rights, equal treatment and access.
For example, Title IX requires more gender equity in sports, while Title I provides additional resources for economically disadvantaged kids.
Because of federal rules, students with special needs or disabilities are entitled to be educated. The Education Department also fills a critical role in collecting and analyzing school data on student performance.
The department sets the tone for U.S. education and offers incentives to move schools in a positive direction. During the Obama administration, Education Secretary Arne Duncan has encouraged education reform through the competition for Race to the Top grants.