Just as Americans kicked off the long Labor Day weekend, a little-known federal agency took a bold step to hold the banking industry -- including individual executives -- accountable for the mortgage meltdown still plaguing the nation's ailing economy.
On Sept. 2, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) filed lawsuits against 17 of the nation's most influential banks -- including Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley. FHFA, which is the conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, seeks to recover losses the two giant, taxpayer-backed housing enterprises sustained on nearly $200 billion of soured mortgage securities.
The agency alleges that the big banks misrepresented or omitted key information about the bundled mortgages' quality -- for example, stated underwriting standards were not followed -- that Fannie and Freddie bought as investments. The agency took similar action in July against another banking giant, UBS.
Three years after the mortgage meltdown tanked the global economy, these aggressive and well-documented lawsuits comprise one of the most ambitious efforts to date to hold the industry accountable and scrutinize in greater detail what went wrong -- something that is still sorely needed.
FHFA's effort is a milestone, but the lawsuits' filing before the holiday meant it hasn't received the attention it deserves.
This is groundbreaking litigation not only in scope but because it names individual banking executives, something previous federal probes have generally been reluctant to do. Reuters writer Jonathan Stempel pointed out that detail in a smart analysis that shouldn't only be a business-insider read.
The lawsuit against JP Morgan, for example, names 38 individual defendants. Twelve execs are named in the Bank of America suit, while seven merit a mention in the Morgan Stanley filing.
The lawsuits allege that these individuals, most of whom are not well-known but still work in this highly paid industry, signed off or were responsible for providing misleading information.