Few retirement decisions are as critical, or as easy to get wrong, as when and how to take your Social Security benefits. The rules can be so convoluted that many people rely on what they're told by Social Security employees, but that could prove to be an expensive mistake.
Certified financial planner Kate Gregory of Huntington Beach, Calif., uses sophisticated Social Security claiming software to recommend strategies that maximize clients' lifetime benefits. Gregory advised one of her clients, a widow, to apply for her own small retirement benefit first so that her survivor benefit could grow, then switch to the larger benefit later. When the woman contacted Social Security, however, she was told she could get the survivor benefit only.
"That left her really flustered," Gregory says.
The widow eventually was able to get the benefits she's entitled to in the correct order, but financial planners worry about people who don't get professional advice and who could be led astray.
"Most people are going to say, 'Well, that's what the government told me' and let it drop. And that's unfortunate," says CFP Mary Beth Franklin, author of "Maximizing Social Security Retirement Benefits."
The cost of mistakes
A lot of money is potentially at stake. The difference between the best claiming strategies and the worst could add up to $100,000 over the lifetime of a single person and $250,000 for married couples, says William Meyer, CEO of Social Security Solutions.
People who apply for benefits may be told they're eligible for six months of back payments and that claiming the lump sum reduces their monthly benefits only slightly. Over time, though, that reduction adds up, especially when cost-of-living increases are factored in.
"The agents are saying, 'Hey, your monthly income only goes down $50,' or whatever it is," Meyer says. "They don't tell you, 'Hey, over your lifetime, that could be a reduction of $20,000.'"