A man in northern Minnesota struggled to breathe late one night. His wife called 911 from their landline telephone. Because the couple must climb a hill outside their home to get cellphone reception, they fear what might have happened if they had no landline.
An elderly rural woman sends pacemaker readings to her faraway heart doctor using her landline phone. She can't do this with a cellphone.
A southern Minnesota woman uses her landline phone to operate her medical-alert system. She lives on a fixed income.
These and other Minnesotans — including many senior citizens and rural residents — need and deserve local landline phone service that is accessible, affordable and reliable.
To that end, for 100 years, Minnesota has regulated the price and service quality of local telephone service. Minnesota law also requires phone companies to extend service to all Minnesotans, no matter where they live. These laws have served Minnesota well.
Unfortunately, the Legislature is considering bills — H.F. 1066 and S.F. 736 — to eliminate these price and service quality regulations. The bills would allow phone companies to charge higher rates with degraded service and access. Capitol insiders have dubbed the measure the "CenturyLink bill." A similar deregulation measure in another state is called the "AT&T bill." It speaks volumes that these bills are named after the phone companies that are pushing them. In one state, prices more than doubled after local telephone service was deregulated.
As representatives of AARP-Minnesota, the Minnesota AFL-CIO and the Minnesota attorney general's office, we call on the Legislature to reject these bills.
Under the bills: