Minnesota legislators continued work over the weekend on a measure to prevent those convicted of domestic abuse or stalking from possessing firearms.
House leaders pushed the vote back to Wednesday, giving the measure's sponsors an extra two days to finish a small technical change.
Critics of the proposal are working to ensure that there is ample due process for anyone who risks losing their firearm due to a restraining order. The measure also prohibits anyone with a restraining order from having a firearm while the order is in effect.
State Rep. Tony Cornish, the Legislature's most outspoken critic of firearm restrictions, defended his work on the measure over the weekend in a letter to constituents.
"The bill was terrible when it was introduced," he wrote.
Cornish, R-Vernon Center, said he felt the risks were too high to try to block it, potentially having to make the argument that convicted domestic abusers and stalkers deserved access to firearms.
"If we would have just said no and not worked on it, there was a very good chance of it passing in its terrible form," he wrote.
He said there are now protections to ensure firearms are not taken away in the event of a restraining order until the case is heard by a judge.