Are city dog licenses going the way of VCRs and film cameras? In an age when dogs sport name tags and personalized collars and have microchips injected between their shoulder blades, Golden Valley Police Chief Stacy Altonen thinks the answer is "yes."
Next month the Golden Valley City Council is expected to drop a requirement that residents license their dogs, joining Plymouth, Minnetonka, Brooklyn Center, New Brighton, Falcon Heights and Northfield in the no-license category.
Altonen said the city is simply dropping an ordinance that wasn't effective and that cost the city in staff time. Only about 600 dogs -- a fraction of the canines residing in Golden Valley -- were licensed each year.
"It's small money savings, but savings nonetheless," Altonen said. "We know that the majority of dog owners are noncompliant. Simply having an ordinance on the books doesn't strike fear in the heart of dog owners."
While most cities still require dog licenses, some big suburbs have gone the other way. Plymouth dropped licensing last year and Minnetonka did so in 2000. Barb Cox, the Plymouth Police Department's public information officer, said her city made the move to save money.
"In 17 years here, I can count on one hand the dogs we returned because of city tags," she said. "We return more dogs with microchips ... or because people call right away when they lose their dogs so when we find them we know who lost them."
'No fear to comply'
Many city dog license and leash laws date to the 1970s, when there was a rabies scare, said Cindy Johnson, director of customer service for the Animal Humane Society in Golden Valley. City ordinances requiring licenses always include submission of proof that animals had been vaccinated for rabies.