I've made the case previously that metro goose hunters have fared poorly under regulations developed in recent years by the Department of Natural Resources.
Specifically, the allowance of over-water hunting in the early goose season has significantly reduced opportunities for Twin Cities-area waterfowlers, essentially — and ironically — by driving the birds into the central metro, where hunting is prohibited and where the birds feel safe, albeit unwelcome.
Complicating matters for hunters, far fewer geese exist in the metro than even 10 years ago, in part because goslings and adults still are being rounded up in summer and destroyed in an effort to address nuisance complaints from homeowners and others. Also, hunting land is being gobbled up by development in the ever-expanding Twin Cities.
Thus, early-season goose hunters have fewer opportunities at fewer birds and fewer places to hunt. Yet geese continue to plague the very parts of the Twin Cities that want them least.
In other words: the worst of all possibilities.
This problem, to the degree it is a problem, can't be solved completely. Regulations aside, geese will fly where they want to fly.
But if over-water hunting were again prohibited in the early metro season, more geese would be more comfortable outside the central metro than what is currently the case — and more available to hunters. Not incidentally, less disturbance of mallards, teal and other fowl also would occur before the duck opener.
But if you're waiting for change, don't. When the issue is waterfowl hunting, the DNR under Commissioner Tom Landwehr believes less regulation is more, whether the subject is opening-day duck shooting hours, wood duck limits, two hen mallards in the daily bag (six in possession), the scheduling of youth waterfowl day before some ducks fledge — or over-water early goose hunting.