Gov. Mark Dayton said Friday that he believes Minnesotans deserve a "reckoning" for the problems with the MNsure website, but he's not ready yet to point fingers of blame.
"The people of Minnesota have been terribly inconvenienced," Dayton said. "The best I can determine at this point in time is that it's not for lack of intent or professional desire to make this as successful as possible from the very beginning. Obviously we've fallen far short of the mark."
With lawmakers demanding answers about the state's error-prone online health insurance exchange and a review underway by the state legislative auditor, Dayton and MNsure leaders on Friday offered the most details to date about decisions made in the nascent days of the agency.
Of key interest is why MNsure officials scaled back the mandate of the company hired to lead the effort — Reston, Va.-based Maximus — and whether that decision has continued to affect the site's performance.
Dayton said some of that information will come from the legislative audit, "with the perspective of 20-20 hindsight."
But MNsure's interim CEO Scott Leitz said he hopes a report next week from UnitedHealth Group's Optum division, which performed a two day end-to-end assessment of the entire IT system, will provide "an initial read."
The state selected Maximus as the lead contractor to hire subcontractors and manage what was to become $46 million in federal grants.
The company released a statement to lawmakers Thursday describing the evolution of its work, in which it was moved into a supporting role in February. By May, it had one project manager working in St. Paul.