Gov. Mark Dayton on Tuesday called for $842 million in state borrowing to fund dozens of public construction projects all over Minnesota, saying the cost of the debt would be worth the economic jolt it would deliver.
"My proposal would put thousands of Minnesotans to work throughout our state," Dayton said at a Capitol news conference, laying out a hefty wish list of bonding projects that includes more than $200 million for construction projects on public college campuses, $32 million to renovate the 10th Avenue Bridge in Minneapolis, money to replace or refurbish transportation and utility infrastructure, and dollars for dozens of local economic development projects.
But state lawmakers reacted coolly to Dayton's proposal, with Senate DFLers advocating a slimmed-down project list and House Republicans questioning the need for it entirely.
"We are not looking to do a bonding package this year," said House Speaker Kurt Daudt, R-Crown. "But we will certainly look at these projects through our bonding committee and include the worthy ones next session."
Leveraging the state's debt capacity for public construction projects statewide is a bipartisan Capitol tradition, and Dayton has been a particularly spirited advocate for expensive bonding bills that take advantage of sustained low interest rates. While lawmakers do some amount of bonding nearly every year, typically more ambitious bonding proposals come in the second year of the two-year budget cycle. Last year Dayton and lawmakers approved a $1.2 billion bonding bill.
House Republicans, who stepped into the majority in January, said they want more time between this year's session and next to vet the nearly $2 billion in requests that Dayton winnowed to $842 million.
"What we haven't had a chance to do is really properly evaluate those projects, and that's what we've typically done in past legislative interim periods, and that's what I anticipate doing again this coming interim," said Rep. Paul Torkelson, R-Hanska, chairman of the House Capital Investment Committee, which assembles the bonding bill.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, DFL-Cook, said Senate Democrats would produce a bonding proposal more modest in size than Dayton's, and more focused on a few key areas: wastewater treatment infrastructure, university campuses, housing, and local roads and bridges. Bakk also leaned on legislative custom in downplaying odds of any bonding bill passing this year.