We who work daily to mitigate the harms of the juvenile criminal legal system are disappointed with the front-page Oct. 17 article "Crime — but no punishment." Star Tribune readers deserve a more complete story.
The current juvenile criminal legal system is a pernicious maze with too many paths in and too few paths out. Alternative paths that improve youth outcomes must be created.
For example, there must be age-appropriate routes to mental health and addiction services so adolescents can get back on track to healthy, productive lives. Instead, the current system's standard responses of probation and incarceration increase the likelihood that young people will commit another crime.
We sympathize with Tina Thomas, the grandmother of the accused teen in the story. She is asking for help, as do many people with family members suffering addictions. We also stand with the Uber driver and other victims who have been harmed and want to know what will happen to make things right.
A more healing path for Ms. Thomas, her grandson and the Uber driver is one that asks those responsible for harm to actively make things right. This can be especially transformative for young people — when all who are impacted discuss their varied needs. They may talk about which systems or institutions have failed each of them and therefore also share responsibility for the harm. This can be in person or through mediated communication, and will result in a mutually agreed upon accountability plan.
The new process would also honor Thomas' pain and be honest with her. Punishment and exclusion will not help her grandson. In fact, it denies him the right to learn and grow from his mistakes, and to heal from his addictions and trauma. Nor does punishment effectively deter or prevent young people from causing harm. We have an entire industry that warehouses young people and whose "treatment" frequently perpetuates abuse and more trauma.
Further, Ramsey County Attorney John Choi's office has good reason to believe the new approach will be more effective. Other jurisdictions have taken a similar approach, and the results clearly show that young people diverted into community-led restorative justice processes (including for violent offenses) reoffend at half the rate as those whose cases go through the traditional system.
Developmental psychology confirms that this type of meaningful accountability leads more frequently to remorse, learning and growth. On the other hand, when judges or other institutional actors impose consequences on young people, that process often engenders stigma, defiance and disconnection, thus leading to the high recidivism in our current system.