Federal conservation and environmental programs that affect hunters, anglers and other outdoor enthusiasts have been targeted for major budget trims in the U.S. House as Congress wrestles with the budget deficit.
But many fishing, hunting and conservation groups -- including Ducks Unlimited, Pheasants Forever and Trout Unlimited -- say the proposed cuts by the Republican-controlled House are a "slash and burn" approach that threatens hunting and fishing. Forty-two conservation groups sent Congress a letter protesting the cuts, and they are urging their members to voice opposition. (Read the letter at startribune.com/cluboutdoors.)
"Conservation programs should shoulder a fair and proportionate burden of reduction to the federal deficit, but clearly that is not the case here," said Dave Nomsen of Pheasants Forever, based in Minnesota.
Among the proposals in the House budget bill HR1:
• Eliminate funding for the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA) grant program, which over 20 years has protected about 26 million acres of waterfowl habitat in public-private partnerships with landowners, states and groups like Pheasants Forever. Those partners matched the $1 billion in federal allocations with another $2.3 billion.
Minnesota has received about $32 million, which was matched by more than $95 million in private dollars. Nearly 100,000 acres have been protected by easements or acquisition, another 59,000 acres have been restored and 50,000 acres of habitat have been improved.
"NAWCA is a huge resource for delivering on-the-ground conservation for Minnesota," said Matt Holland, PF's director of conservation.
• Trims $400 million -- 90 percent -- from the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which comes from offshore oil and gas royalties that, since 1964, have gone to provide recreation and protect parks, forest and wildlife areas. Supporters say the fund generates $4 in economic value for every $1 invested.