Not surprisingly, much of the talk at this month's Cold Climate Grape Conference in Minneapolis was about … cold climates and grapes.
Especially how last winter's polar vortex (with 53 days below zero in Minnesota) affected grapes in these climes and the vines they grow on. Turns out it was quite a bit, but only temporarily and with lessons learned.
"We all suffered a lot, as did our grapevines," added Peter Hemstad, viticulturist at the University of Minnesota and co-owner/winemaker at St. Croix Vineyards in Stillwater. "When we harvested the crop," Hemstad said, "the output was pathetic."
Hemstad surveyed nine Minnesota wineries, all of which said injury to vines was very severe (44) or severe (56).
The bad news: Yields for the 2014 vintage were way down, by 50 percent or more, as vines lost many of their "primary buds" and produced a lot fewer clusters of grape. The good news: The vines by and large survived and should ease back into a groove this year, assuming our subzero nights don't extend well into March. The best news: Growers and vintners learned a lot about which grapes to grow and where.
"If you're going to have a sustainable industry," said John Maloney, owner of Cannon River Winery in Cannon Falls, "it has to be built around what we actually can grow here. I can't grow bananas in Sogn County [western Norway]."
Hemstad hammered home the way that, basically, growing good grapes is a lot like real estate: location, location, location. Last winter, he said, "is why we've been saying site selection is the No. 1 thing to worry about. We're a marginal place to grow grapes, so the sites are crucial." Places to avoid: low-lying areas (where the coldest air goes), damp and/or super-fertile soil (that whole "vines like to suffer" deal) and north-facing slopes (not enough sunshine).
Other takeaways from the conference, which 550 growers, winery owners and others attended: