Supporters of a new four-lane bridge over the St. Croix River are wading into stormy political waters in hopes of keeping the proposal afloat.
The National Park Service (NPS) determined in October that the St. Croix River Crossing bridge would cause "direct and adverse" harm to the scenic and recreational qualities of the river, which is protected by federal law.
"What the ruling really said was you can't put in a new bridge in a new location," Adam Josephson, east metro manager for the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), told a gathering of 22 bridge supporters last week.
But with several years of work and planning behind them, the bridge supporters aren't giving up. They are building clout as the St. Croix Bridge Coalition to become a formal -- and formidable -- lobby in Washington, D.C.
In light of the NPS determination, the best hope for a new bridge lies with Congress, which would have to exempt the bridge from the U.S. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Only two exemptions to the law, which protects several free-flowing rivers nationwide from development, have been granted in 40 years, Josephson said.
Coalition members say a new bridge is critical to solving traffic congestion in Stillwater and meeting business objectives in the bustling St. Croix region. The river isn't as "pristine" as some people would believe, said Russ Korpela, who heads the Chamber of Commerce in New Richmond, Wis.
"We're not talking about putting a bridge over the Grand Canyon," Korpela told last week's gathering. "This is a fairly developed area."
Todd Clarkowski, the MnDOT engineer who has managed the St. Croix bridge project for several years, said the agency has suspended much of its work, such as right-of-way acquisition, roadway design and relocation of the historic Shoddy Mill and Warehouse buildings that lie in the path of the project. Some work will continue, such as a preliminary design of the proposed bridge, Clarkowski said.