The number of Minnesotans exposed to secondhand smoke fell to an all-time low in 2010, and 9 in 10 people now forbid smoking in their homes, according a new state survey released Thursday.
The survey, conducted every three years by the Minnesota Department of Health, suggests that the state's controversial 2007 indoor smoking ban has produced a dramatic shift in Minnesotans' thinking on the hazards of cigarette smoke.
How dramatic? A majority of smokers now refuse to smoke in their own homes, the survey found.
"This is the first [survey] that captures the effects of the Freedom to Breathe Act," said Raymond Boyle, research director at ClearWay Minnesota, a nonprofit smoking-cessation and research group that partners on the survey. "It's very encouraging."
Nonetheless, about 45 percent of respondents reported being exposed to second-hand smoke at some point in the previous week, down from 57 percent three years ago.
More than 90 percent said they believe secondhand smoke is harmful.
In a spirited debate before the passage of the 2007 law, many bar and restaurant owners argued that a smoking ban would hurt their business. But researchers said Thursday that a recent University of Minnesota study indicates the smoking ban hasn't caused economic harm.
The study, which was separate from the state smoking survey, examined employment changes in bars and restaurants in the state between 2004 and 2008, the latest data available at the time, and found no sign that the smoking ban crimped hiring.