Bolstered by past precedent and a fresh oral opinion by the city attorney's office, backers of a potential charter amendment to fund Minneapolis neighborhood parks say there's a clear legal path to put it on the ballot.
Assistant City Attorney Burt Osborne told the city's Charter Commission Wednesday that a charter amendment to authorize a levy increase for parks is a "proper topic" for a charter amendment.
"That's pretty significant," Brian Rice, an attorney for the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, said.
The legal guidance followed an informal advisory in February by the city attorney's office that said that a non-charter referendum to raise the levy was not authorized under either state law or the city charter. It also suggested that a referendum on issuing bonds for parks as a possible avenue.
But the Park Board doesn't want to borrow the money and pay extra interest charges but rather levy the increased tax annually. Moreover, borrowed money couldn't be used for stepped-up maintenance such as more timely mowing and pruning as the board wants.
Independently, at least two groups recently uncovered a past precedent supporting a charter amendment on raising taxes for parks. In 1937, city voters overwhelmingly rejected just such a proposal months after a setback in the national economy that followed the initial gains of the New Deal during the Great Depression.
Voting on charter amendments to raise taxes for city libraries, schools and even police hiring occurred periodically from 1921 to 1966. That's the last year with such a proposal, when voters approved an increase for the library board. But voters approved a $140 million bond issue for libraries in a non-charter referendum in 2000.
The 1937 park vote was resurrected by separate researchers digging through files of the League of Women Voters Minneapolis and archives at the Park Board.