ALBANY, N.Y. – Municipalities that installed traffic cameras to boost revenue are scraping for cash to fill budget gaps after complaints by drivers forced them to cancel their use.
Nassau County on Long Island ended its program after speed cameras led to the issuance of more than 400,000 tickets in less than two months, opening a $90 million budget hole over the next three years. In Ohio, Dayton is cutting in half its number of police cruisers, and Linden, N.J., is shelving plans to hire more cops after both states effectively ended camera systems following a backlash from motorists.
Cameras that monitor speed and red lights have become a quick way to raise revenue for local governments. While the programs are touted as a way to make roads safer, the perception among drivers is that cities are using cameras solely to pump up their coffers, said Ohio state Sen. Bill Seitz, a Republican who opposes them.
"There's some evidence that perhaps they do promote safety," he said. But "the costs outweigh the benefits, and the revenue-enhancement feature of this predominates over safety."
Ohio, New Jersey and New York's Nassau County moved to effectively end their camera programs this month, joining a national trend. Speed cameras are already banned in at least a dozen states, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The number of red-light camera programs in the U.S. has dropped to 469 from a high of 540 in 2012.
"They're a political liability, but it's an easy way to raise revenue without raising taxes," said Howard Cure, head of municipal research at Evercore Wealth Management.
Still, relying on traffic cameras isn't a long-term solution to revenue shortfalls because drivers eventually figure out where they are, Cure said.
In Nassau County, Republican executive Ed Mangano and legislators used the $30 million in projected annual revenue from speed cameras to help persuade a state control board to end a three-year wage freeze. Then the residents spoke up.