What if it cost you $1,000 to have a kitchen fire extinguished? Or $500 for emergency response to an auto accident?
The Coon Rapids City Council is considering charging people for the use of the city's emergency services.
In difficult times, user-fee systems could become the norm for cities trying to maintain services and keep property taxes low despite stretched budgets and tough economic times, said Gary Carlson, intergovernmental relations director for the League of Minnesota Cities.
"Cities are becoming more sophisticated and looking for ways they can assess the cost more directly from those who use or benefit from a service," he said. "It's the basic philosophy of taxation versus user fees. I would venture to guess over the last 10 to 20 years more governments are looking to the opportunities where, if you can avoid generally levying a tax and apply the cost to the user or beneficiary, that is a route to take."
In Coon Rapids, the fee proposal was sent back to staff for more work. City Manager Matt Fulton and Mayor Tim Howe both said the idea is not off the table, although the council is leery.
"That's what people pay their taxes for," said Howe, whose city is reeling from more than a million dollars in lost state aid and unreimbursed funds. "As a council, we need to examine those types of things because we are being hit with these LGA [Local Government Aid] cuts continuously and are pretty much down to nothing received from the state."
Cities won't know until the end of the legislative session how much they will lose in state aid and unrefunded tax credits. Add in plummeting property values, a state-imposed levy cap, rising property tax delinquencies and lackluster development, and it's easy to see why cities are looking for creative ways to pay the bills.
The way Fulton sees it, taxpayer money goes to train, equip and hire emergency staff for the good of the community. But maybe the actual consumers of emergency aid should pay a little more, he said.