Reprinted from the Sept. 2, 1929, edition of the Minneapolis Tribune.
In his Labor Day message, U.S. Labor Secretary James J. Davis properly lays much stress on the fact that the welfare of the laborer and the welfare of the nation as a whole are inextricably bound up with each other. He urges us to remember that the country's prosperity is wrapped up in the pay [envelope] of the worker, and he reminds us too, that production is dependent, not on workers alone or on employers alone, but on the friendly partnership which exists between these two groups.
These truths are so obvious today that Davis appears to be a master of platitudes when he recites them. No one seriously doubts today that there can be no national prosperity worthy of the name, which is not foundationed on the prosperity of the worker. Few have the temerity to deny that industry and commerce flourish most when the well-paid laborer and the farsighted employer meet on common cooperative ground.
It is self-evident today that industry has as great a stake in good working conditions and a fair compensation for service rendered as has labor, and that any injustice to the worker is an injustice to industry itself. Labor Day has taken on a new significance since Colorado, in 1887, became the first state to make it a legal holiday. If it was a class holiday then, it is most assuredly a mass holiday today.
There is not a man, woman or child in the country whose welfare is not identified, directly or indirectly, with that of labor. There is scarcely a thinking adult who does not recognize the fact that labor, to whom the day is dedicated, not only shares in our national prosperity, but by its efficiency and intelligence, contributes largely to it.
Our new concept of labor is a healthful one, and it is one which is vitalizing the entire nation. Davis may indulge in platitudes, but they are platitudes, nevertheless, which have a social and economic significance which is quite incalculable.
• • •
The perennial question as to whether the constantly increasing tendency to substitute machines for men makes the problem of unemployment more acute was recently put to Henry Ford. The Detroit manufacturer replied as follows: